Dental, RCM, AI, Claims
-
August 17, 2026
There’s a familiar pattern in growing dental practices. The schedule gets busier, the front desk starts falling behind, insurance verification becomes harder to keep up with, claims don’t get followed up on as quickly as they should, and eventually the solution seems obvious: we need another person.
For a long time, that was probably the right answer.
Dental software has improved enormously, but most of it still requires someone to do the work. Practice management systems organize information, clearinghouses move claims, and payer portals make insurance information available online. Yet someone on the team still has to retrieve that information, make sense of it, put it where it belongs and deal with whatever doesn’t go according to plan.
As a result, dental practices have largely grown their administrative teams alongside their patient volume. More patients create more insurance verifications. More treatment creates more claims. More claims create more follow-up. Eventually, enough small tasks accumulate that the practice needs another set of hands.
AI is beginning to change that equation. Not because every job in a dental office can or should be automated, but because more of the routine work within those jobs can be.
For established practices, that could relieve some of the pressure on teams already stretched thin. For newer practices, the opportunity may be even more interesting. A dentist building a practice today can decide which administrative processes are worth building in the first place rather than inheriting the same workflows dental offices have relied on for decades.
Most practice owners want to grow. They want a fuller schedule, more new patients, another provider or perhaps a second location someday. When we think about growth, we usually focus on production, collections, chairs, providers and patient volume.
What gets less attention is the administrative work that follows.
Every additional patient brings more information to manage. More treatment creates more claims, which means more follow-up, more payments to reconcile and more opportunities for something to require attention.
A growing practice can absorb that work for a while. The front desk picks up a few additional responsibilities. The office manager helps with insurance verification. Someone checks outstanding claims when there’s time. Eventually, though, the existing team can’t absorb much more.
Hiring is often the logical next step, and sometimes it absolutely is the right one. Great people are essential to a great dental practice. But the traditional model has also created an assumption we rarely stop to examine: as patient volume grows, administrative headcount has to grow with it.
That made sense when people were the only way to get the work done. It makes less sense when some of that work can now happen without adding another task to someone’s day.
Spend a morning near the front desk of a busy dental office and it becomes obvious why good people matter.
Patients arrive confused about balances. Someone calls with a toothache and needs to be worked into an already packed schedule. A parent is trying to coordinate appointments for several children. Another patient is nervous about treatment and wants someone to walk through what happens next.
Those situations require context, judgment, patience and communication. They’re also the moments that shape how patients experience the practice.
Much of the administrative work happening alongside those interactions is far more routine. Insurance verification can mean spending hours moving between payer portals and the practice management system, gathering benefits and updating patient records. Billing teams face a similar burden when monitoring claims, often checking dozens of them simply to identify the handful that actually require attention.
The work is necessary, but not all of it requires the judgment or experience of the person doing it. Historically, that distinction didn’t matter much. If the work needed to get done, someone on the team had to do it.
That’s beginning to change.
Insurance verification is a good example. There will always be situations where an experienced team member needs to get involved. Patient information may not match, coverage can be unusual, or a payer may return information that simply doesn’t make sense.
But not every verification looks like that. Much of the process follows a predictable path: access the payer, locate the patient, gather the relevant benefits, interpret the information and update the patient record.
Claims follow a similar pattern. An experienced biller can be enormously valuable when a claim has been denied, underpaid or unresolved for weeks. That same expertise isn’t necessarily needed to discover that a recently submitted claim was received and is still processing.
Dental offices have traditionally bundled routine work and exception handling together because the same person had to do both. AI makes it possible to begin separating them.
For decades, most dental technology has been designed to help employees work more efficiently. That technology has been valuable, but it hasn’t fundamentally changed the way administrative work gets done. Someone still operates the software.
Newer AI tools introduce a different model. Instead of simply giving an employee a faster way to complete a task, software can increasingly complete portions of the task itself and involve the employee when something requires attention.
Consider insurance verification. Traditional technology can give a team digital access to insurance information, but an employee may still need to retrieve it, interpret it and update the practice management system.
In a more automated workflow, software can handle much of that process and surface the cases that need human review. The employee remains important but no longer has to touch every transaction.
That distinction becomes more meaningful as a practice grows. Saving a few minutes on an occasional task may not change much. Removing repetitive work from hundreds or thousands of transactions over the course of a year can.
Newer practices have an advantage that established practices rarely get: they haven’t accumulated years of processes simply because that’s how things have always been done.
A dentist opening a practice today can think differently about how the administrative side of the business should grow.
Traditionally, patient growth has brought administrative growth with it. As the schedule fills, the practice adds front-office support. Insurance work consumes more of someone’s day. Billing becomes a larger function. Each addition may be entirely reasonable on its own, but over time the practice builds an administrative structure around the volume of manual work it has created.
A newer practice can ask a different question from the beginning: which processes should actually require our team’s attention?
If routine insurance verification can happen largely in the background, there is little reason to design a future position around manually completing every verification. If claims can be monitored automatically, an experienced biller can spend more time working the claims that actually need intervention.
This doesn’t mean trying to build a practice with the fewest employees possible. It means being intentional about the kind of work you add as the business grows.
The opportunity is to increase patient volume and production without administrative complexity increasing at exactly the same rate.
Growing practices accumulate what could be called operational debt.
A temporary workaround becomes a process. That process becomes someone’s responsibility. As volume increases, the responsibility grows until it consumes a meaningful portion of someone’s job. Eventually, the practice may hire around a process that was never deliberately designed in the first place.
This isn’t a sign of a poorly run practice. It happens because people solve the problems in front of them. Over time, though, those solutions become part of the organization and get harder to change.
Newer practices have an opportunity to avoid some of that. They don’t necessarily need to automate an old manual process; in some cases, they can avoid creating it in the first place.
There’s a meaningful difference between automating a workflow that already requires several people and designing the workflow from the beginning so employees get involved primarily when their attention adds value.
For a growing practice, that’s less about cutting costs than creating operating leverage.
The administrative burden in dentistry is significant. Benefit verification alone accounted for an estimated $2.1 billion in dental administrative spending in the CAQH data reported by the ADA in 2025.
And that’s just benefit verification.
The information itself is important. Patients and practices need to understand coverage, deductibles, maximums and benefits. But the amount of manual effort historically required to get that information is worth questioning.
At the practice level, small inefficiencies become much larger as volume grows. A process that consumes a few hours each week in a young practice can eventually become a substantial part of someone’s job. Multiply that same process across several locations and it can become an entire department.
The way a practice handles repetitive work today can influence the administrative structure it needs years from now.
Much of the conversation around AI eventually finds its way to headcount: how many employees can this technology replace?
That may be the wrong place to start.
Think about the best front-office employee you’ve worked with. Their value probably isn’t their ability to copy information from one system into another. It’s the way they interact with patients, keep a difficult schedule moving, solve unexpected problems and understand the nuances of the practice.
Having that person spend a meaningful portion of the week navigating payer portals isn’t a particularly good use of what makes them valuable.
The same is true of an experienced biller. Their expertise matters when a claim has been denied, underpaid or unresolved. There’s considerably less value in having that same person repeatedly check claims that are moving through the payer normally.
Automating routine work doesn’t make those employees less important. Done well, it gives them more time for the parts of their jobs where their experience actually matters.
For most of the history of dental practice software, employees have been responsible for moving nearly every piece of work through a process. Technology helped organize it, but people were still responsible for pushing it forward.
A more automated practice operates differently. Routine work can happen in the background, while the team gets involved when something requires judgment, communication or intervention.
Insurance verifications that follow the expected path can be completed without someone working through them one by one. The unusual cases get surfaced for review. Claims can be monitored without a biller repeatedly checking every one, allowing the team to focus on those that stall, deny or require follow-up.
The team spends less time searching for problems and more time solving the ones that actually exist.
For an established practice, that can create capacity without immediately adding another employee. For a newer practice, it can influence how the organization is built from the beginning. And for a group operating across multiple locations, avoiding unnecessary manual processes becomes even more important because every inefficiency gets multiplied.
Dentists are understandably selective about where they want AI involved in their practices. There’s a meaningful difference between using technology for administrative work and allowing it to influence decisions that directly affect patient care.
Still, adoption is already underway. The ADA’s 2026 research found that more than two in five dentists surveyed were using AI for at least one practice task, while another quarter planned to use it.
Administrative workflows are a natural place for much of that adoption to happen. Dental practices contain a large number of repetitive tasks that follow predictable patterns, consume real staff time and don’t become more valuable simply because a person performs them manually.
The goal isn’t to automate something simply because it can be automated. The better question is whether automation improves the way the practice operates while giving the team more time for the work where people are genuinely needed.
An overwhelmed team may genuinely need another employee. A new practice will still need great people. And a growing organization will almost certainly add talented employees as it expands.
The more interesting question is what those people should be doing.
Before adding another position, look beyond the job title and examine the work itself. Which responsibilities depend on judgment, experience, relationships and communication? Which exist primarily because someone has historically needed to log in, retrieve information, update a record or check whether something has changed?
Twenty years ago, that distinction wasn’t particularly useful. Both required a person.
Today, it matters.
For dentists building practices now, there’s an opportunity to think beyond automating the office they already have. Think about the office you want to have five years from now and build toward it deliberately.
Great dental practices will always depend on great teams. The opportunity with AI isn’t to change that. It’s to make sure that as a practice grows, its people spend more of their time doing work worthy of their time.
The practices that benefit most from AI may not be the ones that adopt the most technology. They may simply be the ones that get better at deciding which work is actually worth their people’s time.
If you'd like to learn more! Click on another blog we have here
See Foji running inside your practice management software and find out how much time your team gets back
